Every week, people ask us the same question:

“Is this junk mail or phishing?”

Here’s the truth:
For most users, that distinction doesn’t matter — and in real-world situations, you can’t reliably tell the difference anyway.

Cybersecurity companies define “junk” and “phishing” based on the sender’s intent. That works for industry professionals, but it does absolutely nothing for the average user staring at a suspicious email. You don’t have access to the sender’s motives. You can only see the message sitting in your inbox.

So let’s break this down in a way that actually makes sense.

---

Junk Mail and Phishing Use the Same Tactics

Most “junk mail” (legitimate marketing emails) and most phishing attacks share the same playbook:

• Tracking whether you opened the email
• Tracking how much you scrolled
• Tracking which links you clicked
• Grabbing basic device information
• Trying to influence your behavior

On the surface, they look identical. They behave identically. They even use the same tools — tracking pixels, link redirects, templates, and branding.

So from a user’s perspective?

The line is blurry by design.

---

The Real Difference Comes Down to Intent

Here’s how the industry draws the line:

Junk Mail

• Annoying advertising
• Designed to sell you something
• Follows compliance rules (unsubscribe links, proper headers, etc.)
• Tracks your behavior to improve marketing

Phishing

• Designed to steal something
• Passwords, identities, credit cards, account access
• Fake login pages and impersonated brands
• Hidden sender information and malicious links

Same tactics, different goals.
But users cannot determine that goal by looking at the email.

This is exactly why the distinction is almost useless outside the cybersecurity bubble.

---

Why This Confuses Everyone

The current model assumes users can inspect the email and infer intent.

You can’t. Nobody can.

You don’t know whether the sender ultimately wants:

• Your money
• Your data
• Your password
• Or simply your attention

By the time you find out, you’ve already clicked something.

That’s not a fair or practical system for end users.

---

A Better Approach: “Expected vs. Unexpected”

Instead of teaching people to decide whether an email is “junk” or “phishing,” we should be teaching them something simpler — and much more effective:

If you weren’t expecting the email, treat it as hostile until proven otherwise.

That’s it. One rule.

This removes all confusion and puts the user back in control.
Whether the email is harmless marketing or a serious threat, you’re covered.

---

How to Handle Any Suspicious Email

Here’s what we advise every DTS client:

• Don’t click links
• Don’t open attachments
• Don’t reply
• Don’t call any number listed in the email
• Don’t trust logos or branding
• Verify through a known channel (official website, phone number, etc.)

This one unified behavior protects you regardless of the sender’s motive.

---

Why the Industry Still Uses the Old Terms

Marketing pushes boundaries, phishing imitates marketing, and threat classifications are built for cybersecurity teams — not everyday users. Unfortunately, those internal labels have spilled into public communication, which creates unnecessary confusion.

At Diagnostics Technical Support (DTS), we cut through that noise. Our job is to protect you, not drown you in terminology.

---

The Bottom Line

The difference between junk mail and phishing is based on intent — and intent is invisible to the user. The safest, simplest, most effective approach is to ignore that distinction and focus on one question:

“Did I expect this email?”

If the answer is no, pause and verify before you take any action.

If you want us to audit your organization’s email security, train your staff, or harden your Microsoft 365 environment, reach out. We can help you build protection that’s simple, strong, and actually works in the real world.